Asset Recovery - Volume of Restraint Orders Obtained
Volume of restraint orders obtained for the Financial Year To Date (FYTD), across Local Criminal Justice Board areas. Since performance data is for part of the year (April to June 2008), it is measured against a proportion of the end-of-year target.
| Volume of Restraint Orders Obtained | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CJS Areas | 2007/08 Target | Financial Year To Date Achieved | Financial Year To Date Percentage Achieved |
| England & Wales | 772 |
283 |
147% |
| Avon & Somerset | 21 |
1 |
19% |
| Bedfordshire | 8 |
5 |
250% |
| Cambridgeshire | 10 |
5 |
200% |
| Cheshire | 14 |
tbc |
tbc |
| Cleveland | 12 |
6 |
200% |
| Cumbria | 7 |
1 |
57% |
| Derbyshire | 15 |
8 |
213% |
| Devon & Cornwall | 22 |
1 |
18% |
| Dorset | 10 |
6 |
240% |
| Co. Durham & Darlington | 8 |
5 |
250% |
| Dyfed Powys | 7 |
4 |
229% |
| Essex | 22 |
1 |
18% |
| Gloucestershire | 8 |
3 |
150% |
| Greater Manchester | 51 |
8 |
63% |
| Gwent | 9 |
2 |
89% |
| Hampshire & Isle of Wight | 24 |
1 |
17% |
| Hertfordshire | 14 |
16* |
457% |
| Humberside | 12 |
0 |
0% |
| Kent | 22 |
7 |
127% |
| Lancashire | 19 |
12 |
253% |
| Leicestershire | 15 |
tbc |
tbc |
| Lincolnshire | 9 |
1 |
44% |
| London | 98 |
91 |
371% |
| Merseyside | 30 |
6 |
80% |
| Norfolk | 11 |
8 |
291% |
| North Wales | 9 |
5 |
222% |
| North Yorkshire | 11 |
1 |
36% |
| Northamptonshire | 9 |
4 |
178% |
| Northumbria | 19 |
12 |
253% |
| Nottinghamshire | 15 |
3 |
80% |
| South Wales | 32 |
4 |
50% |
| South Yorkshire | 17 |
6 |
141% |
| Staffordshire | 14 |
6 |
171% |
| Suffolk | 11 |
13 |
473% |
| Surrey | 15 |
2 |
53% |
| Sussex | 20 |
5 |
100% |
| Thames Valley | 28 |
15 |
214% |
| Warwickshire | 7 |
2 |
114% |
| West Mercia | 16 |
0 |
0% |
| West Midlands | 34 |
6 |
71% |
| West Yorkshire | 28 |
6 |
86% |
| Wiltshire | 9 |
1 |
44% |
1. Orders included are those that have been investigated by a Police Force or a Regional Asset Recovery Team (RART) and prosecuted by the CPS. Credit is given to the LCJB whose police force did the investigation, or the police force which referred the case to the RARTs for investigation.
2. The England and Wales FYTD achieved figure includes British Transport Police.
3. The financial year to date percentage achieved compares the financial year to date achieved against a proportion of the end-of-year target, e.g. if the financial year to date is six months (April-September), it compares against half the end-of-year target.
4. Even though target performance is assumed to be equally distributed through the year, actual performance in the past has not always followed this pattern.
5. Data shown as at 14/07/08, except figures marked with * data shown as at 20/10/08