Asset Recovery - Volume of Confiscation Orders Obtained

Volume of confiscation orders obtained for the Financial Year To Date (FYTD), across Local Criminal Justice Board areas. Since performance data is for part of the year (April to June 2008), it is measured against a proportion of the end-of-year target.



Volume of Confiscation Orders Obtained
CJS Areas 2008/09 Target Financial Year To Date Achieved Financial Year To Date Percentage Achieved
England & Wales
4,437
1,119
101%
Avon & Somerset
118
29
98%
Bedfordshire
45
17
151%
Cambridgeshire
57
18
126%
Cheshire
77
tbc
tbc
Cleveland
69
9
52%
Cumbria
39
35
359%
Derbyshire
83
35
169%
Devon & Cornwall
125
10
32%
Dorset
54
12
89%
Co. Durham & Darlington
46
9
78%
Dyfed Powys
39
11
113%
Essex
127
5
16%
Gloucestershire
45
25
222%
Greater Manchester
300
115
153%
Gwent
50
17
136%
Hampshire & Isle of Wight
139
9
26%
Hertfordshire
81
28
138%
Humberside
69
12
70%
Kent
125
21
67%
Lancashire
111
14
50%
Leicestershire
88
24
109%
Lincolnshire
52
19
146%
London
573
100
70%
Merseyside
172
59
137%
Norfolk
63
11
70%
North Wales
52
11
85%
North Yorkshire
59
16
108%
Northamptonshire
50
9
72%
Northumbria
108
27
100%
Nottinghamshire
87
42
193%
South Wales
187
51
109%
South Yorkshire
99
22
89%
Staffordshire
81
27
133%
Suffolk
60
29
193%
Surrey
83
3
14%
Sussex
117
26
89%
Thames Valley
164
45
110%
Warwickshire
41
7
68%
West Mercia
91
20
88%
West Midlands
199
39
78%
West Yorkshire
163
48
118%
Wiltshire
49
24
196%

1. Orders included are those that have been investigated by a Police Force or a Regional Asset Recovery Team (RART) and prosecuted by the CPS. Credit is given to the LCJB whose police force did the investigation, or the police force which referred the case to the RARTs for investigation.
2. The England and Wales FYTD achieved figure includes British Transport Police.
3. The financial year to date percentage achieved compares the financial year to date achieved against a proportion of the end-of-year target, e.g. if the financial year to date is six months (April-September), it compares against half the end-of-year target.
4. Even though target performance is assumed to be equally distributed through the year, actual performance in the past has not always followed this pattern.
5. Data shown as at 14/07/08

DirectGov