Asset Recovery - Volume of Restraint Orders Obtained
Volume of restraint orders obtained for the Financial Year To Date (FYTD), across Local Criminal Justice Board areas. Since performance data is for part of the year (April to September 2007), it is measured against a proportion of the end-of-year target.
| Volume of Restraint Orders Obtained | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CJS Areas | 2007/08 Target | Financial Year To Date Achieved | Financial Year To Date Percentage Achieved |
| NATIONAL: | |||
| England & Wales |
642
|
494
|
154%
|
| LOCAL: | |||
| Avon and Somerset |
16
|
13
|
163%
|
| Bedfordshire |
6
|
4
|
133%
|
| Cambridgeshire |
8
|
7
|
175%
|
| Cheshire |
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
| Cleveland |
12
|
4
|
67%
|
| Cumbria |
6
|
6
|
200%
|
| Derbyshire |
14
|
4
|
57%
|
| Devon and Cornwall |
17
|
10
|
118%
|
| Dorset |
8
|
5
|
125%
|
| Durham |
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
| Dyfed Powys |
6
|
1
|
33%
|
| Essex |
17
|
4
|
47%
|
| Gloucestershire |
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
| Greater Manchester |
48
|
21
|
88%
|
| Gwent |
8
|
0
|
0%
|
| Hampshire and IoW |
19
|
11
|
116%
|
| Hertfordshire |
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
| Humberside |
9
|
10
|
222%
|
| Kent |
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
| Lancashire |
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
| Leicestershire |
15
|
12
|
160%
|
| Lincolnshire |
8
|
3
|
75%
|
| London |
75
|
98
|
261%
|
| Merseyside |
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
| Norfolk |
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
| North Wales |
7
|
5
|
143%
|
| North Yorkshire |
8
|
6
|
150%
|
| Northamptonshire |
8
|
6
|
150%
|
| Northumbria |
15
|
8
|
107%
|
| Nottinghamshire |
14
|
25
|
357%
|
| South Wales |
30
|
10
|
67%
|
| South Yorkshire |
13
|
30
|
462%
|
| Staffordshire |
11
|
22
|
400%
|
| Suffolk |
10
|
7
|
140%
|
| Surrey |
11
|
6
|
109%
|
| Sussex |
16
|
7
|
88%
|
| Thames Valley |
22
|
6
|
55%
|
| Warwickshire |
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
(tbc)
|
| West Mercia |
15
|
2
|
27%
|
| West Midlands |
30
|
43
|
287%
|
| West Yorkshire |
23
|
21
|
183%
|
| Wiltshire |
7
|
3
|
86%
|
1. Orders included are those that have been investigated by a Police Force or a Regional Asset Recovery Team (RART) and prosecuted by the CPS. Credit is given to the LCJB whose police force did the investigation, or the police force which referred the case to the RARTs for investigation.
2. The England and Wales FYTD achieved figure includes British
Transport Police.
3. Even though target performance is assumed to be equally distributed
through the year, actual performance in the past has not always
followed this pattern.
4. Data shown as at 14 December 2007.